Physics Lournal

Powered by 🌱Roam Garden

3.) Interference of Photons

Another example of superposition concerns the location and momentum of photons in space: if we take a beam of monochromatic light, we know something about the location and momentum of the photons.

The information we have about them is that they each are located in the region of space through which the beam is traveling, and they have a momentum which is given by the frequency times a universal constant, according to the photo-electric law. This information constitutes what is called a translational state.

We can speak about the description quantum mechanics gives us of this interference, via considering an experiment:

Say we have an interferometer, passed through a beam, splitting it into two components, and we make the two components interfere. Just as with the preceding section we can take a single photon beam, and inquire about the effect of the interferometer, which will give us an example of the conflict between wave and particle descriptions of matter.

Again, as with the preceding section we consider the photon to be partly in each of the component beams, which is a translational state that is a superposition of the translational states of the two component beams. This leads us to a generalization of the term translational state as it is applied to photons.

For a photon to be in a definite translational state it does not require it to be restricted to one beam, but may be associated with two or more beams.

In the mathematics of the theory, each translational state is associated with some wave function of ordinary wave optics, meaning they are superposable.

We also consider what takes place when we attempt to measure the energy of one of the components, the result of which will correspond to the whole photon, or nothing at all. This means the photon must suddenly change from being associated partly with a number of beams, to being associated with only one.

It could be possible to make an energy measurement without destroying the component beam, opting to reflect the beam from a mirror and observe its recoil, but after such a measurement it will be impossible to bring the two component beams to interfere.

In this manner, quantum mechanics is able to reconcile the wave and particle behavior of light, with the solution being to associate each translational state of a photon with one of the wave functions of wave optics.

This association, however, cannot be explained in terms of classical theory, and is entirely novel. As opposed to the behavior of particles and waves in classical mechanics, this association can only be interpreted statistically, with the wave function providing us the information necessary to make only probabilistic statements about where the photon may be located after measurement.

Prior to the advent of quantum mechanics, people were aware of the statistical nature of the connexion between waves of light and photons, however, they were not aware of was that the wave function represents the probability of one photon being in a particular place, as opposed to the number of photons in said space.

If the two beam components are made to interfere, the constituent photons will do so as well, meaning sometimes these photons would have to annihilate one another, and other times they would have to produce four photons.

The behavior of these photons represents the constructive and destructive interference resulting from the wave behavior of matter, where crests and troughs cancel out, and crests meeting crests combine.

The issue here is that this would violate the law of conservation of energy.

The new theory avoids this violation by connecting wave functions with probability for a single photon, where each photon is partially within the beam components, and thus only interferes with itself.

The association of particles with waves is not peculiar to light, but rather is of universal applicability: all kinds of particles are associated with waves, and thus all wave motion is associated with particles.